Criminal Law Conversations【2025|PDF|Epub|mobi|kindle电子书版本百度云盘下载】

Criminal Law ConversationsPDF格式电子书版下载

注意：本站所有压缩包均有解压码： 点击下载压缩包解压工具

Ⅰ.PRINCIPLES3

Chapter 1.Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law&MEIR DAN-COHEN3

Comments:12

Kyron Huigens—Duress Is Never a Conduct Rule12

Samuel W.Buell—Decision Rules as Notice: The Case of Fraud13

Anne M.Coughlin—Of Decision Rules and Conduct Rules, or Doing the Police in Different Voices15

Luis Duarte d'Almeida—Separation, But Not of Rules17

Adil Ahmad Haque—The Constitutive Function of Criminal Law19

Eric J.Miller—Are There Two Types of Decision Rules?20

Malcolm Thorburn—A Liberal Criminal Law Cannot Be Reduced to These Two Types of Rules22

Reply:24

Meir Dan-Cohen24

Chapter 2.Empirical Desert&PAUL H.ROBINSON29

Comments:39

Mary Sigler—The False Promise of Empirical Desert39

Adam J.Kolber—Compliance-Promoting Intuitions41

Michael T.Cahill—A Fertile Desert?43

Alice Ristroph—The New Desert45

Youngjae Lee—Keeping Desert Honest49

Matthew Lister—Desert: Empirical, Not Metaphysical51

Alice Ristroph—Response to Lee and Lister53

Joseph E.Kennedy—Empirical Desert and the Endpoints of Punishment54

Andrew E.Taslitz—Empirical Desert: The Yin and Yang of Criminal Justice56

Adil Ahmad Haque—Legitimacy as Strategy57

Laura I Appleman—Sentencing, Empirical Desert, and Restorative Justice59

Reply:61

Paul H.Robinson61

Chapter 3.Defending Preventive Detention&CHRISTOPHER SLOBOGIN67

Comments:75

Michael Louis Corrado—Slobogin on Dehumanization75

Michael Marcus—Don't Abandon Sentencing Reform to Defend Preventive Detention78

Rinat Kitai-Sangero—The Presumption of Innocence versus Preventive Detention80

Matt Matravers—Unreliability, Innocence, and Preventive Detention81

Joseph E.Kennedy—The Dangers of Dangerousness as a Basis for Incarceration83

Reply:84

Christopher Slobogin84

Chapter 4.The Economics of Crime Control&DORON TEICHMAN87

Comments:93

Russell D.Covey—The Limits of the Economic Model: Becker's Crime and Punishment93

Alon Harel—The Economic Analysis of Crime Control: A Friendly Critique95

Keith N.Hylton—Efficient Deterrence and Crime Control97

Morris B.Hoffman—Law, Economics, and Neuroethical Realism100

Reply:101

Doron Teichman101

Chapter 5.The Difficulties of Deterrence as a Distributive Principle&PAUL H.ROBINSON105

Comments:116

Russell D.Covey—Deterrence's Complexity116

Douglas A.Berman—Making Deterrence Work Better118

Doron Teichman—In Defense of Deterrence120

Jonathan S.Masur, Richard H.McAdams, and Thomas J.Miles—For General Deterrence122

Reply:124

Paul H.Robinson124

Chapter 6.Why Only the State May Inflict Criminal Sanctions: The Case Against Privately Inflicted Sanctions&ALON HAREL129

Comments:137

Miriam Baer—Eliminating the Divide Between the State and Its Citizens137

Doron Teichman—Why the State May Delegate the Infliction of Criminal Sanctions139

Malcolm Thorburn—Why Only the State May Decide When Sanctions Are Appropriate140

Stuart P.Green—Why Do Privately Inflicted Criminal Sanctions Matter?142

Reply:144

Alon Harel144

Chapter 7.Results Don't Matter&LARRY ALEXANDER AND KIMBERLY KESSLER FERZAN147

Comments:153

Gerald Leonard—Some Reasons Why Criminal Harms Matter153

Peter Westen—Why Criminal Harms Matter155

Thomas Morawetz—Results Don't Matter, But...157

Jeremy Horder—On the Reducibility of Crimes159

Reply:160

Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan160

Chapter 8.Post-Modern Meditations on Punishment: On the Limits of Reason and the Virtue of Randomization&BERNARD E.HARCOURT163

Comments:173

Alice Ristroph—Games Punishers Play173

Michael M.O'Hear—Chance's Domain175

Alon Harel—The Lure of Ambivalent Skepticism177

Ken Levy—Punishment Must Be Justified Or Not at All179

Reply:181

Bernard E.Harcourt181

Chapter 9.Remorse, Apology, and Mercy&JEFFRIE G.MURPHY185

Comments:195

Sherry F.Colb—Retaining Remorse195

Stephanos Bibas—Invasions of Conscience and Faked Apologies196

Susan A.Bandes—Evaluation of Remorse Is Here to Stay: We Should Focus on Improving Its Dynamics198

Lisa Kern Griffin—Insincere and Involuntary Public Apologies199

Janet Ainsworth—The Social Meaning of Apology201

Reply:203

Jeffrie G.Murphy203

Chapter 10.Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law&MARK KELMAN207

Comments:218

Paul Litton—Unexplained, False Assumptions Underlie Kelman's Skepticism218

John Mikhail—Unconscious Choices in Legal Analysis220

Margaret Raymond—Interpretive Constructions and the Exercise of Bias222

Alice Ristroph—Interpretive Construction and Defensive Punishment Theory224

Reply:226

Mark Kelman226

Chapter 11.Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs&S.E.MARSHALL AND R.A.DUFF229

Comments:238

Stuart P.Green—Sharing Wrongs Between Criminal and Civil Sanctions238

Shlomit Wallerstein—Victim, Beware! On the Dangers of Sharing Wrongs with Society240

Adil Ahmad Haque—Sharing the Burdens of Justice241

Matthew Lister—Contractualism and the Sharing of Wrongs243

Michelle Madden Dempsey—Sharing Reasons for Criminalization? No Thanks...Already Got ‘Em!245

Andrew E.Taslitz—Public versus Private Retribution and Delegated Revenge247

Reply:248

S.E.Marshall and R.A.Duff248

Chapter 12.Monstrous Offenders and the Search for Solidari Through Modern Punishment253

Comments:262

Marianne Wesson—Domesticated Monsters262

Janet Ainsworth—“We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us”: Cognitive Bias and Perceptions of Threat264

Douglas A.Berman—Have Good Intentions Also Fueled the Severity Revolution?266

Reply:268

Joseph E.Kennedy268

Ⅱ.DOCTRINE273

Chapter 13.Against Negligence Liability&LARRY ALEXANDER AND KIMBERLY KESSLER FERZAN273

Comments:281

Leo Zaibert—For Negligence Liability281

Michelle Madden Dempsey—The Object of Criminal Responsibility283

Alan Brudner—Is Negligence Blameless?285

Stephen P.Garvey—Fatally Circular? Not!286

Andrew E.Taslitz—Cognitive Science and Contextual Negligence Liability288

Kenneth W.Simons—The Distinction Between Negligence and Recklessness Is Unstable290

Reply:291

Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan291

Chapter 14.Rape Law Reform Based on Negotiation: Beyond the No and Yes Models&MICHELLE J.ANDERSON295

Comments:305

Andrew E.Taslitz—Self-Deception and Rape Law Reform305

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan—Sex as Contract308

Robin Charlow—Negotiating Sex: Would It Work?310

Sherry F.Colb—Conversation Before Penetration?312

Marianne Wesson—You Can't Get Away from Consent313

Reply:314

Michelle J.Anderson314

Chapter 15.Provocation: Explaining and Justifying the Defense in Partial Excuse, Loss of Self-Control Terms&JOSHUA DRESSLER319

Comments:326

Susan D.Rozelle—He Had It Coming: Provocation as a Partial Justification326

Vera Bergelson—Provocation: Not Just a Partial Excuse328

Marcia Baron—Reframing the Issues: Differing Views of Justification and the Feminist Critique of Provocation329

Joan H.Krause—Tolerating the Loss of Self-Control331

Kenneth Simons—Excuse Doctrine Should Eschew Both the Reasonable and the Ordinary Person333

Stephen P.Garvey—Get Rid of Adequate Provocation!335

Marianne Wesson—Enforcing Virtue with the Law of Homicide336

Reply:338

Joshua Dressler338

Chapter 16.Objective Versus Subjective Justification: A Case Study in Function and Form in Constructing a System of Criminal Law Theory&PAUL H.ROBINSON343

Comments:354

Peter Westen—A Platonic Justification for “Unknowing Justification”354

Shlomit Wallerstein—The Third, Combined, Theory for Justifications356

Mitchell N.Berman—In Defense of Subjective Justifications357

John Mikhail—Constraining the Necessity Defense359

Reply:361

Paul H.Robinson361

Chapter 17.Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor&GEORGE P.FLETCHER AND LUIS E.CHIESA365

Comments:372

Boaz Sangero—“Self-Defense and the Psychotic Aggressor”: What About Proportionality?372

John Mikhail—Self-Defense Against Wrongful Attack: The Case of the Psychotic Aggressor374

Sherry F.Colb—Justifying Homicide Against Innocent Aggressors Without Denying Their Innocence375

Shlomit Wallerstein—Two Flaws in the Autonomy-Based Justification for Self-Defense377

Whitley R.P.Kaufman—Problems for the Autonomy Theory of Self-Defense379

Reply:380

George P.Fletcher and Luis E.Chiesa380

Chapter 18.Self-Defense Against Morally Innocent Threats&JEFF MCMAHAN385

Comments:395

Adil Ahmad Haque—Rights and Liabilities at War395

Shlomit Wallerstein—Why Causal Responsibility Matters396

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan—Can't Sue; Can Kill398

Whitley R.P.Kaufman—Can “Moral Responsibility” Explain Self-Defense?400

Victor Tadros—Doubts About the Responsibility Principle402

Reply:404

Jeff McMahan404

Chapter 19.Self-Defense, Imminence, and the Battered Woman&WHITLEY R.P.KAUFMAN407

Comments:415

Gideon Yaffe—The Real Link Between Imminence and Necessity415

Marcia Baron—In Defense of the Proxy Thesis417

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan—The Values and Costs of Imminence419

Joan H.Krause—Imminence Reconsidered: Are Battered Women Different?420

Jeremy Horder—The “Imminence” Requirement, Battered Women, and the Authority to Strike Back422

Reply:424

Whitley R.P.Kaufman424

Chapter 20.Reasonable Provocation and Self-Defense: Recognizing the Distinction Between Act Reasonableness and Emotion Reasonableness&CYNTHIA LEE427

Comments:432

Susan D.Rozelle—Making Waves: Radicalizing Act Reasonableness432

Carissa Byrne Hessick—Is an Act Reasonableness Inquiry Necessary?434

Terry A.Maroney—Differentiating Cognitive and Volitional Aspects of Emotion in Self-Defense and Provocation436

Caroline Forell—Norms, Proportionality, Provocation, and Imperfect Self-Defense438

Jeremy Horder—Different Ways to Manifest Reasonableness440

Kenneth W.Simons—Requiring Reasonable Beliefs About Self-Defense Ensures that Acts Conforming to Those Beliefs Are Reasonable441

Reply:443

Cynthia Lee443

Chapter 21.Against Control Tests for Criminal Responsibility&STEPHEN J.MORSE449

Comments:460

Stephen P.Garvey—The Folk Psychology of Self-ContrOl460

Michael Louis Corrado—Morse on Control Tests461

Susan D.Rozelle—Sometimes a Control Test Is Just a Control Test463

Terry A.Maroney—Why Is a Folk-Psychological Account of Loss of Control Necessary (And What Precisely Is It)?465

Robert F.Schopp—Cognition, Rationality, and Responsibility467

Reply:469

Stephen J.Morse469

Chapter 22.Abolition of the Insanity Defense&CHRISTOPHER SLOBOGIN473

Comments:482

Susan D.Rozelle—No Excuse for You482

Sherry F.Colb—Not By Cognition Alone484

Paul Litton—Against Integrationism486

Matt Matravers—Justifying Defenses488

Reply:489

Christopher Slobogin489

Chapter 23.Entrapment and the “Free Market” for Crime&LOUIS MICHAEL SEIDMAN493

Comments:503

Sherry F.Colb—Making Sense of Entrapment Law After the Death of Lochner503

Miriam Baer—Entrapment and the Quandary of the Undercover Investigation505

Bruce Hay—An Enforcement Policy Perspective on Entrapment507

Richard H.McAdams—The Entrapment Defense Defended509

Reply:512

Louis Michael Seidman512

Ⅲ.ADMINISTRATION517

Chapter 24.The Political Economy of Criminal Law and Procedure: The Pessimists' View&RICHARD H.MCADAMS517

Comments:528

Darryl K.Brown—The Enduring Pattern of Broad Criminal Codes and a Path for Structural Change528

Samuel W.Buell—The Sources of Overbreadth530

Joseph E.Kennedy—Why Here and Why Now? Bringing History and Sociology to Bear on Punitive Pathology532

Andrew E.Taslitz—The Political Economy of Prosecutorial Indiscretion533

Rachel E.Barkow—An Ounce of Prevention: Realistic Treatment for Our Pathological Politics535

Ronald F.Wright—Prosecutor Elections and Overdepth in Criminal Codes537

Reply:539

Richard H.McAdams539

Chapter 25.Against Jury Nullification&ANDREW D.LEIPOLD543

Comments:551

Richard H.McAdams—Jury Nullification Checks Prosecutorial Power551

Carol S.Steiker—Sculpting the Shape of Nullification Through Jury Information and Instruction553

Sherry F.Colb—Jury Nullification and Erroneous Acquittals: Getting the Causation Backwards554

Josh Bowers—Accuracy and Legitimacy556

Reply:558

Andrew D.Leipold558

Chapter 26.Race-Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System&PAUL BUTLER561

Comments:569

Lawrence Rosenthal—Confusing Cause and Effect569

Robin Charlow—The Effect of Race-Based Jury Nullification on Batson572

LaJuana Davis—The Pernicious Myth of Racial Jury Nullification574

Sherry F.Colb—Rejecting Racial Jury Nullification575

Bennett Capers—On Racially-Based Jury Nullification576

Josh Bowers—Grand-Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Charging Decision578

Reply:580

Paul Butler580

Chapter 27.In Support of Restorative Justice&ERIK LUNA585

Comments:595

Stephanos Bibas—Restoration, But Also More Justice595

David Dolinko—Restorative Caveats597

Margareth Etienne—Restoring Justice Through Individualized Processes599

Joseph E.Kennedy—Restore to What? Supplementing Restorative Justice601

Michael M.O'Hear—Dangers of the Big Tent602

Robert Weisberg—Luna-Inspired Speculations on Restorative Justice604

Reply:606

Erik Luna606

Chapter 28.The Virtues of Offense/Offender Distinctions&DOUGLAS A.BERMAN611

Comments:622

Richard E.Myers Ⅱ—From Each According to His Ability622

Adam J.Kolber—Characteristics Related to Punishment Experience623

Nancy Gertner—Offense/Offender Distinction and Competence625

Laura I Appleman—Splitting the Baby: The Danger of Distinguishing Between Offense and Offender Characteristics627

Joseph E.Kennedy—Blakely, Booker, Accountability, and Intelligibility629

Margareth Etienne—In Need of a Theory of Mitigation630

Reply:632

Douglas A.Berman632

Chapter 29.The Heart Has Its Reasons: Examining the Strange Persistence of the American Death Penalty&SUSAN A.BANDES635

Comments:643

Douglas A.Berman and Stephanos Bibas—The Heart Has Its Value: The Death Penalty's Justifiable Persistence643

Mary Sigler—Emotions, Retributivism and the Death Penalty645

Jeffrie G.Murphy—When Clearly Understood, Retributive Theory Has Much To Offer647

Robert F.Schopp—Reason and Emotion in Capital Sentencing649

Joseph E.Kennedy—Outrage Versus Anger and Hatred651

Carol S.Steiker—Will Empathy Kill the Death Penalty, or Vice Versa?652

LaJuana Davis—Overriding Emotion654

Terry A.Maroney—Can the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment Be More Emotionally Intelligent?656

Reply:658

Susan A.Bandes658

Chapter 30.Mercy's Decline and Administrative Law's Ascendance&RACHEL E.BARKOW663

Comments:673

Ronald F.Wright and Marc L.Miller—Subjective and Objective Discretion of Prosecutors673

Douglas A.Berman—Mercy's Disguise, Prosecutorial Power, and Equality's Modern Construction675

Stephanos Bibas—Political versus Administrative Justice677

Andrew E.Taslitz—The Decline of Criminal Law Representative Populism679

Reply:681

Rachel E.Barkow681

Chapter 31.Criminal Law Comes Home&JEANNIE SUK683

Comments:692

Melissa Murray—The Private Life of Criminal Law692

Laura A.Rosenbury—Whose Privacy?694

Aya Gruber—From Neoliberalism to Libertarianism: Why Neither Criminalization Nor Privacy Is the Answer for Battered Women696

Jennifer Collins—Criminal Law Comes Home to a Family698

Cheryl Hanna—Because Breaking Up Is Hard To Do700

Emily J.Sack—The Crime of Domestic Violence702

Deborah Tuerkheimer—Domesticating Criminal Law: A Normative Defense704

Alafair Burke—Domestic Violence Misdemeanor Prosecutions and the New Policing705

Reply:707

Jeannie Suk707

Index713